First let me address the particular expectation with regard
to the seating arrangements.
Seating is an important aspect of classroom management to
make the students “available” for learning. Just because a student is present
in class doesn’t make him/her available to learn academic or social skills.
There may be several reasons for this. In my links to the OT posts there is
some wonderful information about how optimal sensory motor integration impacts
a child’s ability to attend, follow directions, complete the task on time, etc.
In some children we may see behavioral symptoms—talking out
of turn, distracting others, being goofy or defiant, being unresponsive and
withdrawn, etc. Some of these may be because the students have been given the
opportunity (who can resist chit chatting if the teacher doesn’t set
boundaries?) and others because of poorly developed inhibition. In some
students, lack of inhibition is an acquired behavior (because parents or caregivers
don’t set boundaries or dues to inconsistencies in the follow up). In others it
is because of a learning disability.
Quite often, teachers start with one kind of seating at the
beginning of the year. This changes as they get to know the students and make
observations on their social interactions and learning needs. As they get a better
understanding of their students’ needs, teachers change the seating arrangement.
Some teachers don’t assign seats because they feel that their students can
learn to be more independent.
Sometimes, teachers set up the classroom for their needs—to
make it easy for them to teach. But the key is to keep the students’ needs in
mind—whichever arrangement fosters students’ learning is the best arrangement
for that student body. Now, in a classroom of forty one it is impossible to
find the setup which works for all. This is where individualization comes in.
If we take any random sample of students (of the same age)
their skills will fall under a range. It is up to the teachers to keep track of
their strengths and weaknesses and adapt the environment, materials, and
instruction. This is the case in a regular education classroom, given ideal
conditions. In our schools, teachers are forced (due to various reasons)
to try the ‘one size fits all’ for almost all instruction—social and academic.
When you add a child with a disability, (especially a disability without an
obvious ‘physical’ component) it results in conflicts in philosophy and
methodology.
In this particular instance this can be resolved by
understanding one significant aspect of PDD—difficulty in adapting to change.
The teacher’s reasoning is that by holding your son to the same expectations
she is providing him with an opportunity to grow (thereby treating him as an
equal to his typical peers). The confusion here is because of the assumption
that equal means the same. But that is not true, is it?
If your son changed seats every day and completed his
classwork on time prior to this, then he stepped out of his comfort zone each
and every day! That was a lot to ask of him, given his diagnosis—much more than what his typical
peers were asked to do. When you discuss this with him, do let him know that he
took a big step forward in adapting to these changes.
Next, your son told the teacher he couldn’t see the
blackboard. No child should be asked to sit at a place where he/she can’t see
the board. There is no other alternative. There is more to being able to see
the blackboard than visual acuity. Visual perception may also need nearer seating. (By the way, I don’t know if your son wears
glasses. If he doesn’t this is the perfect opportunity to go for a vision
screening.)
Last, change induces a lot of anxiety in children with PDD.
This anxiety can manifest itself as different behaviors. It is human nature to
pay attention to the child who exhibits attention seeking behaviors as compared
to a quieter or shy student. As teachers we have to remind ourselves constantly
to pay close attention to the needs of these students. I think your son did a
great job advocating for himself by informing his teacher that he couldn’t see
the board. Good for him.
Some questions related to this issue:
- Does the teacher have access to information on PDD?
- Can your son use one of those micro-cassette players to record the teacher’s lesson? That will help you transcribe the lesson after he comes home (given the fact that his classmates don’t want to share their notes).
- Does the teacher give the class extra five minutes at the end of the lesson for them to catch up? A lot of teachers do that:)
I will reply to the other questions in the next post.
Ms. S